Laboratory Evaluation of Isometric Strength and Horizontal Shear Forces Associated with Typical Scaffold End Frame Disassembly Postures
Summary Statement
Report on a study which was conducted to measure the whole body isometric strength capability and horizontal shear forces of 47 male construction workers (age 18-49 years) in seven postures associated with scaffold end-frame disassembly.
August 2000
Abstract
Overexertion injuries comprise the largest category of nonfatal injuries
among construction workers, whose overall injury rates rank among the
highest in the U.S. These injuries typically occur when the biomechanical
stresses associated with tasks such as lifting, carrying, pushing, etc.
exceed the workers' strength capacity. Scaffold erectors' fall exposure
is also high, and thus falls from elevation comprise a large portion of
morbidity and mortality incidents in the construction industry. This study
was conducted to measure the whole body isometric strength capability
and horizontal shear forces of 47 male construction workers (age 18-49
years) in seven postures associated with scaffold end-frame disassembly.
Required coefficient of friction values (RCOF) were also calculated from
the horizontal shear forces. A computer controlled data acquisition system
and custom fabricated test fixture complete with Bertec force platforms
were used to quantify isometric strength and horizontal shear forces in
each of the disassembly postures. An analysis of variance showed that
the effect of posture on isometric strength capability was significant
(p<0.05). The isometric forces resulting from the seven postures ranged
from 334.4 N to 676.3 N. Three of the typical disassembly postures resulted
in considerable biomechanical stress to workers. The study group produced
sufficient isometric forces in the remaining four postures which would
reduce the risk of overexertion injuries due to disassembly of scaffold
end-frames. The static RCOF values resulting from the seven postures during
the disassembly phase ranged from 0.11 to 0.19, thus any surface with
a static COF > 0.2 would reduce the likelihood of a slip. Commonly
accepted "safe" static COF values are 0.5.